Advanced International Journal for Research
E-ISSN: 3048-7641
•
Impact Factor: 9.11
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJFR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2025
Indexing Partners
Romantic Science and Poetry: A Cultural Study
| Author(s) | Mr. Ravindra Singh, Dr. Deepa Sehrawat |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Abstract Rationalists portray science as reason’s crown and see any deference to feeling and imagination as an attack on reason. They dismiss Romanticism as mere regression and ignorance. The Romantic period (late eighteenth to mid-nineteenth century) is, arguably, a fertile overlap of science and poetry. Rather than functioning as isolated disciplines, science and poetry in the Romantic era shared a language of wonder, imagination, and veneration for nature that defied the mechanistic rationalism of the Enlightenment. This paper reviews the collaboration between poets and scientists that reshaped cultural conceptions of knowledge, the natural world, and the human mind. Romantic thinkers such as Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Keats, along with natural philosophers like Humphry Davy and Goethe, treated imagination as a valid mode of inquiry. Their writings present nature not as an inert machine but as a dynamic, living organism. Wordsworth’s Prelude frames scientific observation as a moral and spiritual journey, while Coleridge’s theory of the “esemplastic imagination” parallels the unifying ambitions of contemporary natural philosophy. Similarly, Goethe’s morphological studies combined meticulous empirical methods with aesthetic insight, anticipating integrative approaches in modern science. Romantic literature registered ambivalence toward industrial and technological change. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein dramatized anxieties about unchecked scientific ambition, reflecting broader cultural tensions between vitalist and mechanistic worldviews. Romantic women writers such as Anna Laetitia Barbauld interrogated the gendered power structures of scientific discourse, widening the cultural conversation. By foregrounding feeling, creativity, and ecological sensitivity, Romanticism forged an integrated epistemology in which scientific discovery and poetic expression reinforced one another. This synthesis influenced Victorian literature, early environmental thought, and contemporary science communication, demonstrating the enduring relevance of Romantic ideals. The paper argues that revisiting Romantic science and poetry reveals a historical model for bridging today’s perceived divide between the sciences and the humanities. It attempts to show that imagination and empirical inquiry can coexist as complementary ways of knowing. |
| Keywords | Romanticism, Science and Poetry, Imagination, Nature as Living Organism, Vitalism vs. Mechanism |
| Field | Sociology > Linguistic / Literature |
| Published In | Volume 6, Issue 6, November-December 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-11-06 |
Share this

E-ISSN 3048-7641
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.