Advanced International Journal for Research

E-ISSN: 3048-7641     Impact Factor: 9.11

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 6, Issue 6 (November-December 2025) Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.

AI-Driven Credit Scoring and Financial Inclusion: Performance, Fairness, And Transparency in Alternative-Data Lending

Author(s) Mr. Arav Vikas Dang
Country India
Abstract Access to formal credit remains uneven, especially for individuals with limited or no credit histories. Such “thin-file” borrowers are routinely excluded from conventional bureau-based credit scoring that depends on past repayment records and formal financial footprints. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) allow lenders to incorporate richer, consented alternative data into credit assessment, offering a pathway to improve both default prediction and financial inclusion. This paper evaluates whether AI-driven credit scoring models improve loan default prediction and expand credit access compared with traditional statistical approaches. Using a combination of bureau variables and alternative indicators—including mobile payments, UPI transaction stability, utility-bill regularity, and telecom-based behavioral aggregates—the study examines predictive performance, approval lift among underserved borrowers, fairness trade-offs across demographic groups, and transparency requirements for responsible deployment. Overall results show that ML models (particularly gradient boosting and hybrid ensembles) deliver higher predictive accuracy than logistic-regression baselines and raise approval rates for thin-file applicants without a proportional rise in default risk. However, improvements in access do not automatically translate into equitable outcomes; residual disparities remain, highlighting the need for fairness-aware governance. Explainability tools improve decision transparency but may exhibit instability under class imbalance and data drift that are common in thin-file portfolios. The paper concludes by proposing operational and policy guardrails—fairness audits, interpretable decision rationales, standardized adverse-action notices, and strict data-protection practices—to ensure that AI-based credit scoring advances inclusion while maintaining accountability and consumer trust.
Keywords Alternative data, artificial intelligence, credit scoring, fairness, financial inclusion, machine learning, transparency
Field Business Administration
Published In Volume 6, Issue 6, November-December 2025
Published On 2025-11-28

Share this