Advanced International Journal for Research
E-ISSN: 3048-7641
•
Impact Factor: 9.11
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJFR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 2
March-April 2026
Indexing Partners
From Discretion to Enforcement: A Critical Appraisal of Specific Performance under the Amended Specific Relief Act, 1963.
| Author(s) | Dr. Jai Prakash Kushwah, Suraj Pratap Singh Kushwah |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Abstract The remedy of specific performance has historically been rooted in equitable discretion, operating as an exception to the general rule of awarding damages for breach of contract. Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, courts exercised broad judicial discretion in granting this remedy, guided by principles of fairness, hardship, and readiness and willingness of the plaintiff. However, the enactment of the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 marked a decisive shift in the remedial framework by transforming specific performance from a discretionary relief into a more rule-based and enforceable remedy. The amendment substituted Section 10, curtailed the scope of judicial discretion, introduced the concept of substituted performance, and restricted injunctive relief in infrastructure projects to promote commercial certainty and improve India’s investment climate. This paper critically examines the doctrinal and practical implications of this transition from discretion to enforcement. It analyses whether the legislative intent to strengthen contractual sanctity and ensure ease of doing business has been achieved without compromising the equitable foundations of specific performance. The study further evaluates post-amendment judicial trends of the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts, particularly concerning readiness and willingness under Section 16, substituted performance under Section 20, and statutory limitations under Sections 14 and 20A. Through doctrinal analysis and case-law evaluation, the paper argues that while the amendment enhances predictability and reduces judicial subjectivity, it also raises concerns regarding the dilution of equity-based safeguards. The research concludes by suggesting a calibrated interpretative approach that harmonizes statutory enforcement with equitable justice in contemporary Indian contract law. |
| Keywords | Keywords Specific Performance; Specific Relief Act, 1963; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018; Judicial Discretion; Contract Enforcement; Substituted Performance; Readiness and Willingness; Infrastructure Contracts; Equity; Commercial Certainty; Supreme Court of India; Contract Law Reform. |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-03-01 |
Share this

E-ISSN 3048-7641
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.