Advanced International Journal for Research

E-ISSN: 3048-7641     Impact Factor: 9.11

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 7, Issue 2 (March-April 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of April to publish your research paper in the issue of March-April.

Impact of Auditor Rotation on Audit Quality in India

Author(s) Mr. Ilton Cutinho
Country India
Abstract The mandatory rotation of auditors which is institutionalised in Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013, is a paradigm shift of the corporate governance architecture of India. This regulatory intervention is to break the cosy nexus between auditors and management by requiring individual auditors to be rotated after five years and audit firms after ten years in classes of companies with prescribed rotation requirements. This term paper is a comprehensive qualitative study of the effects of this requirement on the quality of audit in the Indian setting. Through the use of a strict qualitative research design based on the thematic analysis of regulatory inspection reports, judicial orders and academic literature between the years 2014 and 2025, the research question that will be addressed is whether the legislative purpose of a fresh look has been adopted into material advances in financial reporting reliability. The study heavily relies on the 2023-2025 Audit Quality Inspection Reports (AQRR) by the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) that find numerous repetitive and systemic patterns of undermined independence, inadequately prepared documentation, and the inability to test Related Party Transactions (RPTs) despite the rotation regime. The results indicate that there is a certain paradox: on the one hand, rotation has effectively broken established tenure; on the other hand, there is no guarantee of increasing the level of professional skepticism. Rather, structural impediments, namely the ubiquitous power of audit network affiliations, the offering of non-audit services which are prohibited, and the so-called competence gap of the initial years of a new engagement still hamper the quality of the auditing. This paper concludes that though Mandatory Auditor Rotation (MAR) is a legitimate structural protection, it cannot act as a panacea on its own and a cultural change toward quality-focused assurance rather than the compliance-based auditing paradigm is needed. They are followed up with practical implications to regulators, audit committees and practitioners and imply that the enforcement capacity of NFRA should be enhanced and that the frameworks governing audit networks should be revisited.
Keywords Auditor Rotation, Audit Quality, Companies Act 2013, National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), Auditor Independence, Corporate Governance.
Field Business Administration
Published In Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2026
Published On 2026-03-18

Share this