Advanced International Journal for Research

E-ISSN: 3048-7641   •   Impact Factor: 9.11

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 7, Issue 3 (May-June 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of June to publish your research paper in the issue of May-June.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 7 Issue 3
May-June 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Corporate Manslaughter And Industrial Disasters In India: Penology Beyond Monetary Compensation

Author(s) Mr. Pratap Honmane, Prof. Priyanka Mirkute
Country India
Abstract Industrial disasters in India spanning chemical leaks, fires, explosions, mine collapses, and toxic waste contamination reveal a persistent tension between rapid industrialisation and the criminal law’s limited capacity to impose proportionate punishment on corporate entities and decision-makers. India does not presently recognise a distinct offence titled “corporate manslaughter.” Instead, prosecutions typically proceed through a patchwork of general penal provisions (notably “causing death by negligence”) and sectoral safety statutes such as the Factories Act, 1948 and the Mines Act, 1952, supplemented by environmental legislation including the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. These frameworks have significantly advanced compensatory remedies often through constitutional tort and environmental adjudication yet the penological architecture (deterrence, denunciation, incapacitation, and retributive proportionality) remains underdeveloped when the wrong is systemic, organisational, and profit-driven. The statutory maximum for “causing death by negligence” under the Indian Penal Code is imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, a structure that struggles to express the gravity of mass casualty events or repeated safety violations.
This research argues that India’s current approach often collapses corporate harm into negligence-based offences and compliance contraventions, producing outcomes that over rely on monetary compensation, regulatory settlements, and intermittent prosecution with low imprisonment incidence. Government data illustrates the magnitude of workplace harm and the enforcement gap: in registered factories, fatal injuries reported under the Factories Act show four digit annual fatalities (e.g. 1,154 in 2018; 1,017 in 2022), while non-fatal injuries remain substantial (e.g. 4,528 in 2018; 2,714 in 2022). Mines data similarly records recurring fatalities and serious injuries: in organised sector mines, reported deaths include 94 in 2019 and 53 in 2023, alongside serious/non-fatal accidents and injuries. Simultaneously, enforcement statistics published by the Government of India show thousands of prosecutions/convictions under the Factories Act (sections 92 and 96A) with very low imprisonment counts in the aggregate (single digits/low double digits for 2020-2022 totals), raising questions about deterrence and expressive condemnation.
Supreme Court jurisprudence has undeniably transformed the remedial landscape. In M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak), the Court articulated “absolute liability” for hazardous industries, signaling that enterprises engaged in inherently dangerous activities bear strict responsibility to ensure safety, and constitutional remedies can include compensation. In Bhopal related decisions (Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India; Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India), the Court confronted mass tort claims and state representation, producing a settlement driven model emphasising immediate relief but generating enduring debate about the relationship between compensation and criminal accountability. In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (Bichhri), the Court operationalised “polluter pays” and remediation principles, emphasising the full cost of environmental harm, again foregrounding reparative logic. In the Uphaar tragedy litigation, the Court wrestled with the legality of substituting imprisonment with fine in negligence caused deaths, offering a rare penological window into sentencing philosophy in disaster contexts.
Against this backdrop, this paper proposes a penology “beyond compensation” approach: (i) a dedicated corporate homicide/corporate manslaughter offence calibrated to organisational fault; (ii) sentencing guidelines emphasising custodial accountability of responsible officers; (iii) structured non-monetary sanctions for corporations (probation, monitorships, safety compliance orders, adverse publicity orders, debarment from public procurement, and dissolution in extreme cases); and (iv) integrated data driven enforcement using institutions such as DISH, DGFASLI, DGMS and open data platforms for proactive risk targeting. The paper uses doctrinal analysis and five Supreme Court case studies to demonstrate that while compensation is necessary, it is insufficient for deterrence and justice in industrial disaster governance.
Keywords Corporate manslaughter; industrial disaster; penology; corporate criminal liability; Factories Act; DGMS; DGFASLI; DISH; absolute liability; polluter pays; sentencing; imprisonment; fines; compliance orders; National Green Tribunal.
Field Sociology > Administration / Law / Management
Published In Volume 7, Issue 3, May-June 2026
Published On 2026-05-11
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 3048-7641
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 1Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About AIJFR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9898-79-39-59 editor@aijfr.com