Should billionaires and private equity own sports teams and what are the consequences faced by the sports teams due to ownership of private equities?

Tribhuvan Reddy Magunta

Should billionaires and private equity own sports teams and what are the consequences faced by the sports teams due to ownership of private equities?

Author(s)	Mr. Tribhuvan Reddy Magunta
Country	India
Abstract	THESE TWO PRIVILEGED GROUPS-wealthy individuals and private equity firms-own the professional sports franchises. This article will provide insight into the issues and arguments surrounding the ownership of professional sports franchises through billionaires and private equity firms. It will explore the reasons for major investment in professional sports franchises as an investment asset class, high compound returns on investment, strong revenue generation, and cultural significance on a global level. Professional sports franchises provide high returns on the dollar compared to other asset classes due to their proximity to the consumer, and therefore are attractive to institutional and ultra-high-net-worth investors. A comparison of highly commercialized and private equity-friendly franchises (e.g., the National Football League (NFL), Indian Premier League (IPL)) with the anti-commercialization model in Germany through the Bundesliga and its 50+1 rule (which maintains fan control over franchises) will demonstrate the difference between these leagues with regard to commercialization. The research suggests that investment by private equities has created substantial risk (ethical and structural) for the financial stability (sustainability), advanced technological infrastructure (technological innovation) and improved operational professionalism of sporting organizations. Examples of such negative impacts include the use of public funds to provide subsidies for construction of sports facilities, governance failures that result in corruption and match-fixing issues; and the use of sporting events to mask issues related to the host nation or corporation (e.g., "sportswashing"). In conclusion, the paper proposes potential regulatory solutions, which could include state or fan-driven governance, and non-profit ownership of sporting organizations. The authors contend that although private equity can serve as an effective means of stabilizing the finances of global sport; effective oversight will be necessary in order to maintain the integrity and sportsmanship of global athletes/sport.
Keywords	Private Equity, Sports Ownership, Financialization, Bundesliga 50+1 Rule, Sportswashing, Governance.
Field	Sociology > Economics
Published In	Volume 7, Issue 3, May-June 2026
Published On	2026-06-09

View / Download PDF File

E-ISSN 3048-7641

doi

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr

Downloads

Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 2 Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 1 Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA

About AIJFR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9898-79-39-59	editor@aijfr.com

Advanced International Journal for Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Should billionaires and private equity own sports teams and what are the consequences faced by the sports teams due to ownership of private equities?

Share this