Advanced International Journal for Research
E-ISSN: 3048-7641
•
Impact Factor: 9.11
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJFR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
United Nations Security Council Reform and the Global South: An International Law Perspective
| Author(s) | Mr. Subham Kumar Sahu |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The reform of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has emerged as one of the most persistent and contentious issues in contemporary international law and global governance. Established in 1945 in the aftermath of the Second World War, the Security Council was designed to maintain international peace and security through a structure that reflected the geopolitical realities of the mid-twentieth century. More than eight decades later, profound transformations in the international community have rendered the Council increasingly unrepresentative of contemporary global power distributions and demographic realities. The growing influence of states from the Global South, particularly emerging powers such as India, Brazil, South Africa, and Nigeria, has intensified demands for a more equitable and democratic Security Council. This article critically examines the legal, political, and normative dimensions of Security Council reform from the perspective of the Global South. It evaluates the historical origins of the Council's composition, the legal framework governing institutional reform under the United Nations Charter, and competing reform proposals advanced by states and regional organizations. The article argues that the existing structure of the Security Council perpetuates historical inequalities embedded within the post-war international order and undermines the legitimacy of collective security mechanisms. While legal obstacles to reform remain significant, particularly due to the veto power exercised by the permanent members, the increasing assertiveness of Global South states presents an opportunity to reconceptualize representation, legitimacy, and accountability within the United Nations system. The article concludes that meaningful reform is essential not only for institutional legitimacy but also for ensuring the continued relevance of the Security Council in addressing twenty-first-century challenges. A reformed Council that incorporates broader representation from the Global South would better reflect the principles of sovereign equality, democratic participation, and inclusive multilateralism that underpin contemporary international law. |
| Keywords | United Nations Security Council, Global South, Security Council Reform, Veto Power, International Law, United Nations Charter, Sovereign Equality, Collective Security, Global Governance, Developing States. |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-06-15 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.63363/aijfr.2026.v07i03.6376 |
Share this

E-ISSN 3048-7641
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.