When Should You Use Liquid Clustering? Benchmarking Lakehouse Layout Strategies

Kushal Kumar Vishwakarma

When Should You Use Liquid Clustering? Benchmarking Lakehouse Layout Strategies

Author(s)	Mr. Kushal Kumar Vishwakarma
Country	India
Abstract	Physical data layout is one of the most consequential and least discussed decisions in lakehouse engineering. In Delta Lake environments, practitioners typically choose between three strategies: date-based partitioning, ZOrdering, and the newer Liquid Clustering. Each has trade-offs that are well understood conceptually, but poorly documented. Most published comparisons either come from Databricks itself, or from opinion-based articles that reason from first principles without measuring actual query behaviour. Engineers making layout decisions for production systems deserve controlled benchmark results across a range of realistic workloads. This article presents exactly that. I ran a systematic benchmark comparing all three layout strategies across four analytical workload types on a 50-million-record dataset, using real Databricks query profiles. The results contain at least two findings I have not seen documented anywhere else, and one of them is a failure mode that could silently degrade query performance in a production environment. The research questions were directly motivated by production challenges I encountered while architecting Delta Lake platforms at TCS UK (civil aerospace) and IBM (Shell Maritime), where layout strategy decisions had direct implications for pipeline SLA compliance and cloud compute cost. The workloads benchmarked below—point lookups, time range aggregations, and multicolumn filters—mirror the common query patterns observed in production data platforms. These patterns were specifically selected because they represent the most frequent and resource-intensive operations that directly impact system SLA compliance, effectively capturing the tension between high-concurrency dashboarding, deep-scan historical audits, and the precise, granular forensic lookups required by enterprise stakeholders. Partitioning, ZOrdering and Liquid Clustering take a fundamentally different approach to organizing data on disk; understanding the tradeoffs is key to choosing the right one for your workload.
Keywords	Benchmarking Lakehouse, Partitioning, ZOrdering and Liquid Clustering
Field	Computer > Data / Information
Published In	Volume 7, Issue 4, July-August 2026
Published On	2026-08-12

View / Download PDF File

E-ISSN 3048-7641

doi

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr

Downloads

Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 4 Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 3 Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 2

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA

About AIJFR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9898-79-39-59	editor@aijfr.com

Advanced International Journal for Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

When Should You Use Liquid Clustering? Benchmarking Lakehouse Layout Strategies

Share this