Advanced International Journal for Research
E-ISSN: 3048-7641
•
Impact Factor: 9.11
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJFR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Pixel-Level Uncertainty Quantification in CCS Seismic Monitoring via Monte Carlo Diffusion Sampling: Application to the Sleipner 4D Benchmark
| Author(s) | Mr. Sunil Manikani, Dr. Murad Yaghi |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | We introduce Monte Carlo Diffusion Sampling (MCDS), a method for generating pixel-level uncertainty maps from a pretrained diffusion representation model (PDRM) without modifying model architecture, adding dropout, or training an ensemble. By running N independent stochastic passes through the PDRM at a fixed intermediate noise timestep t, each with a fresh random noise realisation, we obtain a set of plausible seismic reconstructions whose pixel-wise standard deviation constitutes an uncertainty map. Applied to all 249 inline sections of the Sleipner 4D CO2 seismic benchmark, MCDS reveals: (1) a global mean pixel uncertainty sigma-bar = 0.0348 with narrow cross-inline variation (std = 0.0011), indicating consistent model calibration across the lateral extent of the survey; (2) substantial within-inline spatial heterogeneity, with peak pixel uncertainty reaching 0.22 (6.3x the global mean), concentrating on structurally complex amplitude zones; (3) strong Pearson correlation (r = 0.738) between inline amplitude heterogeneity and mean inline uncertainty, confirming that the PDRM is uncertain precisely where the seismic data is most complex; and (4) a spatially coherent elevated-uncertainty cluster at inlines 174-184, coinciding with the highest amplitude variability in the survey. We argue that MCDS probability maps provide a practical, annotation-free monitoring diagnostic for CCS operations: anomalous uncertainty excursions between seismic vintages may flag zones where CO2 migration has shifted seismic character outside the model training distribution. |
| Keywords | diffusion, deep learning, ccs, ai, seismic machine learning |
| Field | Computer Applications |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-08-18 |
Share this

E-ISSN 3048-7641
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.