Advanced International Journal for Research
E-ISSN: 3048-7641
•
Impact Factor: 9.11
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJFR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
A Comparative Study of Śrīmanta Śaṅkaradeva and Rāmānuja: Theological, Philosophical and Social Dimensions of Bhakti
| Author(s) | Dr. Ratul Borah |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Abstract Śrīmanta Śaṅkaradeva (1449–1568) and Rāmānuja (c. 1017–1137) are two of the most influential figures in the history of Vaiṣṇava thought in India. Although they belonged to different historical periods and regional contexts, both placed devotion (bhakti) to the Supreme Being at the centre of religious life. Rāmānuja developed a systematic philosophical doctrine known as Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta, or qualified non-dualism, whereas Śaṅkaradeva articulated the religious philosophy of Eka Śaraṇa Nāmadharma, centred on exclusive devotion to Kṛṣṇa and the remembrance and recitation of the divine name. The two thinkers therefore share important theological affinities while differing substantially in their philosophical formulations, conceptions of Brahman, the relationship between God, soul and world, the nature of liberation, and the institutional expression of religious life. This article offers a comparative study of the philosophies of Śaṅkaradeva and Rāmānuja. It argues that their similarities are most visible in their rejection of purely abstract conceptions of ultimate reality and their emphasis on a personal and gracious God accessible through devotion. Their differences become clearer when one examines their treatment of the relationship between jīva, jagat, and Īśvara, the status of the material world, the role of ritual and caste, and the meaning of liberation. Rāmānuja formulated a comprehensive Vedāntic metaphysics in which Brahman is qualified by real sentient and non-sentient entities, while Śaṅkaradeva's thought is primarily devotional and scriptural, with Kṛṣṇa as the supreme object of exclusive surrender. The study concludes that Śaṅkaradeva should not simply be classified as another exponent of Viśiṣṭādvaita; rather, his thought represents an independent Assamese development of Vaiṣṇava bhakti that shares significant theological ground with Rāmānuja while pursuing distinctive social, cultural and religious objectives. |
| Keywords | Śaṅkaradeva, Rāmānuja, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Eka Śaraṇa Nāmadharma, Vaiṣṇavism, Bhakti, Kṛṣṇa, Brahman, liberation, Assamese Neo-Vaiṣṇavism |
| Field | Arts |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-09-04 |
Share this

E-ISSN 3048-7641
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.