Advanced International Journal for Research
E-ISSN: 3048-7641
•
Impact Factor: 9.11
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with AIJFR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 1
January-February 2026
Indexing Partners
Supply of copy of electronic evidence - Suggested system for District Courts
| Author(s) | Mr. Sanjay Rambhau Salkute |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 [BSA 2023], Section 63(4) mandates hash value certificates while submitting electronic record for admission. It elevates the electronic record as primary evidence but for submission a proper custody is required. However, no procedural framework exists for courts to supply certified copy of exhibited electronic record. Neither the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, nor the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, contains specific provisions for supplying certified copies of exhibited electronic records. While BSA Sections 75-79 generally address certified copies, but there exists a procedural vacuum regarding the technical and legal framework for courts to supply hash-verified certified copies of electronic exhibits. This preliminary study paper concept for law students, examines the gap between legal requirements under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA),2023, and practical implementation for supplying certified copies of exhibited electronic record in District Courts. This study is based on BSA provisions, case law review, and examination of current court practices. It is studied that, without sound copying procedures, the primary evidence status of electronic records remains on paper for which copying sections will require little infrastructure, trained personnel, and standardized procedures to maintain evidential integrity when supplying certified copies of exhibited electronic record. It is studied that as the Section 63(4) certificates are mandatory and become part of court records, the solution in suggested system is simple because courts already possess the hash values needed, they simply lack procedural guidance on how to use them when supplying certified copies. The suggested system is complementary to, not contradictory with procedural law. This study is limited to supply certified copy of the exhibited electronic record only. |
| Keywords | secure hash value, electronic evidence copy, Section 63(4), court digital evidence, certified copy electronic records. |
| Published In | Volume 7, Issue 1, January-February 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-02-01 |
Share this

E-ISSN 3048-7641
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
AIJFR DOI prefix is
10.63363/aijfr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.